帝王会所

帝王会所 prepares an Assurance Argument and Evidence File as part of its Assurance Filing. Since this is a Comprehensive Evaluation, 帝王会所 is also required to submit a Federal Compliance Filing in its Assurance Filing. All pieces must be completed in the online Assurance System before the review is scheduled to begin. The Assurance Argument is a written report where the institution demonstrates how it meets each Criterion and Core Component. For each Criterion, the institution provides:

• An articulation of how each Core Component within the Criterion is met
• Links to documentary evidence in the institution鈥檚 Evidence File for each articulated claim or argument made.
• A summary statement regarding any additional ways in which the institution fulfills the Criterion that are not otherwise covered in the statements on the Core Components.

The Assurance Argument will link to materials 帝王会所 uploads to its Evidence File to support its brief narrative for each Criterion and Core Component. See  for Accreditation for guidance on identifying evidence and a list of possible sources of evidence for each Core Component. Personally identifiable information (PII) is not permitted. 

帝王会所鈥檚 Assurance Filing will be evaluated by a team of peer reviewers. If the review is being conducted as part of a comprehensive evaluation, the peer review team will write its report after completing its on-site visit and will take into account all of the additional materials involved in the evaluation. The team drafts its report four to six weeks following the start of the review or on-site visit.

In judging whether the institution is in compliance with the Criteria, the team evaluates each Core Component individually. The team determines whether the Core Component is met, met with concerns or not met. The institution meets the Criterion only if all Core Components are met or met with concerns. The institution does not meet the Criterion if one or more Core Components is judged not to be met.

As a federally recognized agency, HLC is required to assure that 帝王会所 meets Title IV program responsibility, as well as complying with the expectations of specific regulations set by the U.S. Department of Education. Compliance with these federal requirements is necessary for the institutions to be eligible for federal financial aid. The areas addressed in the Federal Compliance Review are:

• Assignment of Credits, Program Length and Tuition
• Institutional Records of Student Complaints
• Publication of Transfer Policies
• Practices for Verification of Student Identity
• Publication of Student Outcome Data
• Standing with state and other accrediting agencies

Two months prior to our on-site peer review visit, HLC will conducts an  of the 帝王会所鈥檚 student body. The survey is intended to give students an opportunity to participate in the evaluation process, and to help identify questions for the peer reviewers to ask while on site. 

After the peer review team has reviewed the 帝王会所鈥檚 Assurance Argument and student survey results, the on-site visit will be scheduled and typically lasts 1陆 to 2陆 days. The peer review team works with 帝王会所 to create the agenda for the visit, which typically includes meetings with the leadership and board of trustees, as well as open forums with faculty, staff and students.

A multi-campus visit is included as part of the comprehensive evaluation that have one or more branch campuses. Peer reviewers will visit a sampling of the institution鈥檚 branch campuses and inform the team conducting the comprehensive evaluation as to the quality of the branch campuses.